Proof Positive

Another politician in an infidelity, from the 'family values' sect, or rather party. Big deal. Why did he own up rather than spouting obvious denials and attacking the victim like a good republican? Maybe some shred of decency buried out of plain view, or because the facts were about to come out in a big way? And, who cares? Of course, with Fox shouting a denial so loud we now know they gave the senator warning.
Kind of funny. It wasn't a thought process. I saw the headline and automatically knew it to be a blatant falsehood. Simply because I've followed their claims in the past, and this is totally consistent with their other lies, and in no way resembles statements they make which are truthful. (Anyone notice the wsj is beginning to sound like a few wheels have come off their wagon too?)
Speaking of MSM, I heard a discussion on NPR about the GLBT community beginning to come out in China. They talked of fighting aids and how msm's are becoming an accepted part of the prevention dialog. Huh? Then I heard them say it stood for "Men who have Sex with Men." We've known for ages there is not really a liberal media in this country. Maher summed it up nicely saying we have a center right party and a crazy party. I'd say the media is similar, except I'd describe it is being far right, with fox representing the batshit violent crazy ass fringe. Kind of puts a wry twist on the GOP being in bed with MSM.


1 Comments:
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2009/7/10/752108/-Fox-had-Ensign-affair-letter-earlier-than-it-had-claimed. I felt terribly clever and prescient but I haven't seen any follow-up. Or is it just that Sanford and Wasilla's village idiot stole that particular spotlight?
Post a Comment
<< Home